|
RSS Feed
Interesting strategic move by Google by creating a layer above the social networking solutions out there. As opposed to simply opening up the API of its own social networking tool, Google has created an alliance around three requests -- user profile, list of friends, and user events. What they perceived as the need was an operating system that would allows developers to create applications that run across the existing social networking products and not just another open API. Users can continue to use their existing social networking software but enjoy the benefits of interoperation. As opposed to creating all possible APIs they have strarted with three. This coalition has 100 million member, which is double that of Facebook. Why did Google do this when it does not preferentially support their own product? It makes sense because this interoperability will increase traffic and value creation within this space. More traffic means more queries and more queries mean more ads to serve and that is good for Google. The choice of participants is also complementary -- LinkedIn, Hi5, Friendster, Xing, Plaxo, iLike, Flixster, RockYou, and Slide and Ning. On the product side -- Oracle, and Salesforce.com. See an interesting post on this topic by Marc Andreessen.
Comments (1 )
s
Both Netflix and Apple reported quarterly results today. They are both competing against bigger rivals BlockBuster and Microsoft. In the case of Netflix, the key number being closely tracked and reported is 7.03 million subscribers vs. 3.6 million for Blockbuster. In the case of Apple, three sets of numbers are being reported-- number of Mac users (2.16 million), number of iPhone (1.1 million) users and number of iPod (10.2 million) users. While these numbers may not put them on the top spot in any category individually, collectively they provide them with benefits to one another and this is reflected in faster growth rates individually. Although Apple may not have predicted this when they were facing challenges in the 80s and could have given up the Mac franchise, the fact that it exists is helping out the other business lines. In fact, the WSJ article states that most of their iPod purchases are coming from Windows users. Apple has complementary effects across product and business lines that giving them an edge. Wonder how/when MSFT will get this going for them?
Comments (0 )
s
Steve Jobs is finally ready for third parties to write on the Apple platform. After years of proprietary application development, we will begin to see the long tail of application requirements serviced on the Apple platform. The resulting spurt of experimentation on this platform should lead to more choice for the customers and stronger attraction to the Apple platform. To contrast this with MSFT, Apple used the initial period to develop the platform and the components for the platform to establish the Apple look. feel and experience. The challenge would be to continue this with the third party application developers. Based on the press release, Apple will continue to exercise control over developers by having then leave a finger print/digital signature on their applications.
Comments (0 )
s
If it is possible for a $38 billion dollar company to move quietly, Amazon is doing so. Of late it has been on a tear. In a recent interview with Harvard Business Review, Jeff Bezos talks about their obsession with customers. As he explains it, they provide low price, vast selection and fast delivery as their core value proposition to their customer. Every decision they make is centered around what is best for their customer. To support their value proposition, they are constantly experimenting at all levels and picking and choosing their long term bets. One such bet that is poised to payoff is Amazon Web Services (AWS). This is a project where they have opened their platform to developers and allow them to write programs that work on top of Amazon's services. This has the potential to increase the number of products that can be sold on AMZN's platform, which in turn positively impacts their value proposition of providing a greater selection to their customers. This notion of experimentation coupled with their clear set of customer values is positioning them well.
Comments (0 )
s
I had the opportunity today to present some trends in the IT outsourcing industry to Babson's alumni. Let me recap some of the points that I made in my prepared remarks. IT outsourcing is moving from cost arbitrage based thinking to more of a distributed work thinking, where the work gets fulfilled where it finds the right expertise at the right price, availability and the desired quality. Business models have evolved from time and materials based application, development and maintenance projects to things like BPO, Captive services, Remote services management, and KPO. In fact, some vendors are thinking about moving customers dynamically between models based on, say, rupee fluctuations. The third trend is multi-sourcing. Although this concept is old, some interesting developments have occurred here. Even in situations where companies are signing mega deals (over a billion dollars) it is not uncommon to see multiple vendors in the mix. Under these circumstances, it is important to manage the coordination complexity of projects. Firms like TPI and Everest have entered into the ecosystem to help companies reduce the coordination complexity. In addition, collaboration and workflow management tools that help reduce the complexity are beginning to showup in the marketplace.The final trend that is interesting is centered around innovation. As firms use these outsourcing deals to innovate, they involve many vendors with distinct expertise that end up co-creating value. In these circumstances, who owns the IP and how is value shared and appropriated?
Comments (0 )
s
Why is Bungie taking Halo out of Microsoft? I went through my notes at the time of the acquisition and it said -- "Bungie is an independent developer of action oriented computer and video games. Microsoft gains exclusive publishing and distribution rights to select Bungie-developed titles, including the highly anticipated sci-fi action epic 'Halo.' Bungie made games for Apple computers." Since Xbox is very dependent on Halo, how would this separation help? Are they planning to write for other consoles? Another possibility is that Bungie developers may have felt stifled under Microsoft. Either way, I'm not sure that this benefits Microsoft.
Comments (0 )
s
Error sending email
Email sent successfully
|